Questions and answers
What members asked in the House, and how the government replied. Each record links to the page we read it from, so you can check it yourself.
What we hold
25,473Questions we have ingested: 25,473 · of those, with a reply on file: 3,495
This counts what we have read from the record, not everything Parliament did. A question with no reply here is one whose reply we have not read yet.
Showing 76–100 / 25,473
Preservation and Promotion of Sambalpuri Cultural Heritage
unstarredLOK SABHA · 18th Lok Sabha · Session 8 · Question no. 3506 · Asked on 2026-08-10
Ministry: CULTURE
Member asked
We have not ingested the asking members for this question.
(a) whether the Government has undertaken any initiative to document, preserve and promote the intangible cultural heritage associated with Sambalpuri handloom weaving, folk music, folk dance and traditional festivals of western Odisha; (b) whether any proposal has been received for inclusion of these traditions in national or international heritage recognition programmes; and (c) the details of financial assistance provided for their preservation and promotion during the last five years?
We have not ingested a reply for this question yet. This does not mean the government gave no reply.
Original question sourcePM-VBRY
unstarredLOK SABHA · 18th Lok Sabha · Session 8 · Question no. 3507 · Asked on 2026-08-10
Ministry: LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT
Member asked
(a) the details of the number of persons getting first-time employment under the Pradhan Mantri Viksit Bharat Rozgar Yojana (PM-VBRY); (b) the details of the special provisions made under the said scheme to encourage employment generation in the manufacturing sector in the country; (c) the details of eligibility criteria prescribed for employers to avail incentives under Part B of the PM-VBRY Scheme; and (d) the details of the steps taken by the Government to ensure that the Direct Benefit Transfer (DBT) mechanism under PM-VBRY provides timely, transparent and efficient delivery of benefits to all eligible employees?
We have not ingested a reply for this question yet. This does not mean the government gave no reply.
Original question sourceScientific and Technology-based Systems for Wildlife Conservation
unstarredLOK SABHA · 18th Lok Sabha · Session 8 · Question no. 3508 · Asked on 2026-08-10
Ministry: ENVIRONMENT, FOREST AND CLIMATE CHANGE
Member asked
Mahima Kumari Mewar, P. P. Chaudhary, Sanjay Jaiswal, Janardan Mishra, Mahesh Kashyap, Alok Sharma, Shobhanaben Baraiya, Manoj Tiwari
(a) whether the Government has undertaken any measures to strengthen scientific and technology-based systems for wildlife conservation, biodiversity protection and effective management of human-wildlife conflicts, if so, the details thereof including the major wildlife conservation programmes in which such technologies are being utilised; (b) the present status and progress achieved in utilisation of advanced genetic research facilities, digital biodiversity databases and wildlife information systems set up for prevention of wildlife crimes for wildlife conservation planning and biodiversity management including the location of such facilities, State/UT-wise; (c) whether any institutional mechanism has been established to strengthen research, forensic capabilities and evidence-based decision-making in wildlife conservation, if so, the details thereof; (d) the manner in which these initiatives are expected to improve biodiversity conservation, wildlife monitoring and ecological management across the country particularly in Rajasthan specially in Kumbhalgarh area, Sehore district and Bhopal Lok Sabha Constituency; and (e) whether the Government is running any special programme to promote wildlife conservation, biodiversity management, research, capacity building and technical cooperation in collaboration with Forest Departments of States, research institutes, universities and other scientific organisations, if so, the details thereof?
We have not ingested a reply for this question yet. This does not mean the government gave no reply.
Original question sourceWelfare Schemes for Retired Sportspersons in Tamil Nadu
unstarredLOK SABHA · 18th Lok Sabha · Session 8 · Question no. 3509 · Asked on 2026-08-10
Ministry: YOUTH AFFAIRS AND SPORTS
Member asked
We have not ingested the asking members for this question.
(a) whether the Government is implementing any welfare schemes for retired sportspersons including financial assistance, pensions, medical support, insurance coverage and other welfare benefits in Tamil Nadu, particularly those from Dharmapuri district and if so, the details thereof; (b) the details of number of retired athletes from Tamil Nadu, including Dharmapuri district, who have benefited under such schemes during the last three years and the current year, discipline-wise; (c) whether the Government has taken measures to provide post-retirement support through employment opportunities, coaching assignments, sports administration, skill development and livelihood assistance for retired athletes; and (d) whether any additional initiatives are proposed to strengthen the social security, healthcare, financial stability and continued engagement of retired sportspersons in mentoring young athletes, particularly in Dharmapuri district and if so, the details thereof?
We have not ingested a reply for this question yet. This does not mean the government gave no reply.
Original question sourceSuicides in IITs
unstarredLOK SABHA · 18th Lok Sabha · Session 8 · Question no. 3510 · Asked on 2026-08-10
Ministry: EDUCATION
Member asked
T. M. Selvaganapathi, S. Venkatesan
(a) the details of the numbers of suicides by students, research scholars and staff across various Indian Institutes of Technology (IITs) that have been reported during the last six years, year-wise and institute-wise; (b) the details of age, gender, caste, religion, State, date of suicide, place of occurrence, status of inquiry etc. of those who have committed suicide during the said period, institution-wise; (c) the steps taken by the Government to mitigate the factors contributing to student suicides; and (d) whether it is a fact that there is an urgent need for institutions to strengthen preventive mechanisms, if so, the steps taken by the Government in this regard?
We have not ingested a reply for this question yet. This does not mean the government gave no reply.
Original question sourceEk Ped Maa Ke Naam Campaign
unstarredLOK SABHA · 18th Lok Sabha · Session 8 · Question no. 3511 · Asked on 2026-08-10
Ministry: ENVIRONMENT, FOREST AND CLIMATE CHANGE
Member asked
Jashubhai Rathva, Chintamani Maharaj, Rajesh Mishra, Kamlesh Jangde, Praveen Patel, Ravi Kishan, Anurag Sharma, Bhartruhari Mahtab, Bidyut Baran Mahato, Shivmangal Singh Tomar, Ramesh Awasthi, Manish Jaiswal, Krishna Prasad Tenneti, Vishweshwar Hegde Kageri, Dilip Saikia, Lumbaram Choudhary, Janardan Mishra, Pratap Chandra Sarangi, Rahul Lodhi, Satish Kumar Gautam, Balabhadra Majhi, Dineshbhai Makwana, Kanwar Singh Tanwar, Chandra Prakash Joshi
(a) whether the Government has reviewed the implementation, achievements and environmental impact of the ‘Ek Ped Maa Ke Naam’ campaign, if so, the details thereof; (b) the number of saplings planted and their survival rate, along with the progress achieved, State/UT and Block-wise particularly in Rajasthan, Surguja District of Chhattisgarh, Nabarangpur and Sidhi Lok Sabha Constituencies including the details of participation of tribal communities, Gram Panchayats, Schools, Self Help Groups and other institutions; (c) the specific measures taken to boost public participation and institutional collaboration involving Panchayati Raj Institutions, Urban Local Bodies, schools and corporate entities; (d) the details of special mechanism established for geo-tagging of plantations, digital monitoring, survival assessment, long-term protection and maintenance to ensure effectiveness and sustained environmental benefits under the campaign; (e) the details of contribution of the campaign towards increasing green cover, restoring degraded landscapes, conserving biodiversity and achieving India's climate commitments; and (f) whether any special action plan or financial and technical assistance is being provided to promote indigenous species and water conservation in arid and desert regions like Kutch, if so, the details thereof?
We have not ingested a reply for this question yet. This does not mean the government gave no reply.
Original question sourceIncreasing the Salary Limit for Medical Treatment in ESI Hospitals
unstarredLOK SABHA · 18th Lok Sabha · Session 8 · Question no. 3512 · Asked on 2026-08-10
Ministry: LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT
Member asked
(a) whether the Government has received any proposal for the increase in the salary limit from Rs. 21,000 to Rs. 30,000 for workers in the unorganized sector to avail medical treatment at Employees' State Insurance (ESI) hospitals/dispensaries; (b) if so, the details thereof; (c) whether the Government likely to consider to set up ESI dispensaries at Nedunkandam and Kumily in Idukki due to the presence of large number of workers especially in the plantation sector; and (d) if so, the details thereof?
We have not ingested a reply for this question yet. This does not mean the government gave no reply.
Original question sourceDevelopment of Coastal Tourism in Amalapuram
unstarredLOK SABHA · 18th Lok Sabha · Session 8 · Question no. 3513 · Asked on 2026-08-10
Ministry: TOURISM
Member asked
We have not ingested the asking members for this question.
(a) the details of Initiatives undertaken to promote and develop coastal tourism in Amalapuram Lok Sabha Constituency; (b) the details of coastal tourism projects sanctioned, completed and ongoing during the last three years in the said Constituency; (c) the details of funds allocated, sanctioned, released and utilised for coastal tourism projects during the said period, year and project-wise; (d) nature of infrastructure created or upgraded under such initiatives, including beach development, eco-tourism facilities, cruise and boat tourism, connectivity and visitor amenities in the said Constituency; (e) the details of capacity-building and skill development programmes undertaken to support local communities, including youth, fishermen, women self-help groups and other stakeholders, for participation in coastal tourism activities in the said Constituency; and (f) whether any new proposals for coastal tourism development are under consideration in the said Constituency and if so, the details thereof?
We have not ingested a reply for this question yet. This does not mean the government gave no reply.
Original question sourcePrime Minister's Internship Scheme in Madhya Pradesh
unstarredLOK SABHA · 18th Lok Sabha · Session 8 · Question no. 3514 · Asked on 2026-08-10
Ministry: CORPORATE AFFAIRS
Member asked
We have not ingested the asking members for this question.
(a) the target fixed and achievements made so far under the Prime Minister's Internship Scheme to provide practical training to youth in industries and reputed companies across the country; (b) the number of youth selected under the said scheme in the country as well as in Madhya Pradesh during the last two years along with the number of youth who have completed their internship and who secured permanent or contractual based employment; (c) whether the Government is contemplating running any special campaign to connect maximum youth with the scheme and increase the participation of local industries and establishments in Ratlam-Jhabua-Alirajpur Parliamentary Constituency of Madhya Pradesh which is a tribal-dominated and aspirational region; and (d) if so, the details thereof including the tentative timeline therefor?
We have not ingested a reply for this question yet. This does not mean the government gave no reply.
Original question sourceHolistic Development of Tourist Destinations
unstarredLOK SABHA · 18th Lok Sabha · Session 8 · Question no. 3515 · Asked on 2026-08-10
Ministry: TOURISM
Member asked
Mahesh Kashyap, Dharmapuri Arvind, Lavu Sri Krishna Devarayalu
(a) whether lesser-known spiritual, eco, rural and heritage destinations, including Nizamabad, Basar, Dharmapuri, Kondagattu and forest-based circuits of Telangana have been identified for promotion under any scheme for sustainable tourism projects; (b) the details of steps taken to diversify tourism, reduce pressure on overcrowded destinations and generate local employment; (c) whether the Government is implementing any specific scheme or project for the overall development of Chhattisgarh, especially Bastar Lok Sabha Constituency's Chitrakot Waterfall, Tirathgarh Waterfall, Kanger Valley National Park, Kutumsar Cave, Danteshwari Temple and other natural, cultural, and tribal tourist sites to promote tourism infrastructure, eco-tourism, homestay, local handicrafts and cultural tourism; (d) whether the Government has identified or proposes to support high-potential but relatively lesser-explored tourism destinations in Andhra Pradesh, including Visakhapatnam, Araku–Lambasingi, Gandikota, Papikondalu, Ahobilam and the Buddhist heritage circuit for integrated tourism infrastructure and destination development; and (e) if so, the details of projects sanctioned, under implementation or proposed for such destinations along with the financial assistance provided and expected timelines?
We have not ingested a reply for this question yet. This does not mean the government gave no reply.
Original question sourceLoans to Farmers and Corporates
unstarredLOK SABHA · 18th Lok Sabha · Session 8 · Question no. 3516 · Asked on 2026-08-10
Ministry: FINANCE
Member asked
(a) the details of loans given to farmers since 2014 till 2025–26 and the amount recovered during the same period, year-wise and State/UT-wise; (b) the details of farm loan waivers during the said period, year-wise and State/UT-wise; (c) the details of loans given to corporates since 2014 till 2025–26 and the amount recovered during the same period, year-wise, State/UT-wise; (d) the details of corporate loan waivers/write-offs during the said period, year-wise and State/UT-wise; (e) whether the Government considers the proportion of loan waivers of farmers and corporates to be equitable, if so, the justification therefor and if not, the reasons therefor; and (f) the steps taken by the Government to ensure balanced and fair treatment in loan relief measures?
We have not ingested a reply for this question yet. This does not mean the government gave no reply.
Original question sourceAllocation of funds for Tourist Amenities
unstarredLOK SABHA · 18th Lok Sabha · Session 8 · Question no. 3517 · Asked on 2026-08-10
Ministry: TOURISM
Member asked
(a) the details of funds allocated, sanctioned and utilized for upgrading tourist amenities, view-points, pedestrian tracks and other tourist amenities in Darjeeling and Kalimpong districts during the last three years; and (b) the details of total number of village clusters and rural pockets identified for development under the Vibrant Villages Programme in the border areas of the said districts?
We have not ingested a reply for this question yet. This does not mean the government gave no reply.
Original question sourceRespiratory Tracking System for Workers of Mining Sector
unstarredLOK SABHA · 18th Lok Sabha · Session 8 · Question no. 3518 · Asked on 2026-08-10
Ministry: LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT
Member asked
Arun Bharti, Rajesh Verma, Atul Garg
(a) whether the Government has operationalised the National Occupational Health Registry to track respiratory and long-term health metrics among mining workers and if so, the details thereof; (b) the details of the non-intrusive wearable sensor systems deployed in May 2026 to track toxic gas exposures in real-time; (c) the details of structural checks established within the central health portal to instantly alert regional medical units during high-risk environmental shifts; (d) the details of criteria used to disburse targeted performance-linked health infrastructure grants to mining cooperatives managing localized medical check-up hubs; (e) the details of measures taken by the Government to integrate the said worker health records with the central ESI database for seamless specialized hospital transfers; and (f) the details of projected reduction in peak occupational health incidents following the nationwide deployment of the said proactive digital monitoring network?
We have not ingested a reply for this question yet. This does not mean the government gave no reply.
Original question sourceSOP for Scientific Identification of threatened Species
unstarredLOK SABHA · 18th Lok Sabha · Session 8 · Question no. 3519 · Asked on 2026-08-10
Ministry: ENVIRONMENT, FOREST AND CLIMATE CHANGE
Member asked
(a) the details of the 159 plant and 173 animal species currently officially designated and notified as threatened under Section 38 of the Biological Diversity Act, 2002 across the identified 17 States and 3 Union Territories, State-wise; (b) the targeted execution timeline, structural budgetary allocations and implementation guidelines provided in the new Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) to assist State Biodiversity Boards and Union Territory Biodiversity Councils in launching mandatory species recovery and conservation action plans; (c) the precise scientific validation criteria and field-assessment methodologies deployed by the Botanical Survey of India and the Zoological Survey of India to authenticate local field data and traditional ecological knowledge during the local identification process; and (d) the specific statutory enforcement mechanisms under the 2025 Benefit-Sharing Regulations that mandate differential financial obligations and benefit-sharing collections for biological resources derived exclusively from these newly notified threatened species?
We have not ingested a reply for this question yet. This does not mean the government gave no reply.
Original question sourceData related Obligations
unstarredLOK SABHA · 18th Lok Sabha · Session 8 · Question no. 3520 · Asked on 2026-08-10
Ministry: CORPORATE AFFAIRS
Member asked
Bharti Pardhi, Shrikant Shinde, Ravindra Waikar, Shrirang Barne, Naresh Mhaske
(a) whether the Government has undertaken an assessment of the interaction between the data-related obligations proposed under the draft Digital Competition Bill, including those relating to consent, restrictions on intermixing of data and data portability and the obligations under the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023; (b) if so, the details thereof and if not, the reasons therefor; (c) whether any coordination mechanism, guidance or framework has emerged from the consultations held between the Competition Commission of India and the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology on the interface between competition law and the data protection framework and if so, the details and dates thereof; and (d) whether the Government proposes to issue clarifications to ensure that enterprises are not subjected to duplicative or inconsistent compliance obligations under the two frameworks and if so, the details thereof?
We have not ingested a reply for this question yet. This does not mean the government gave no reply.
Original question sourceIrregularities in Appointments of Teachers in Delhi University
unstarredLOK SABHA · 18th Lok Sabha · Session 8 · Question no. 3521 · Asked on 2026-08-10
Ministry: EDUCATION
Member asked
(a) the number of complaints received regarding fake research papers, fake publications, forged certificates or other documents related to the appointment of teachers in Delhi University and its affiliated colleges since the year 2020; (b) the number of cases out of the said complaints in which inquiry committees were constituted along with their present status; (c) the number of cases in which appointment were cancelled or other administrative and disciplinary actions were taken following the inquiry; and (d) the number of cases handed over to the police, Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) or other investigative agencies along with the steps taken or being taken by the Government to prevent such irregularities in the future, including mandatory digital verification of research papers, publications and certificates?
We have not ingested a reply for this question yet. This does not mean the government gave no reply.
Original question sourceComplaints regarding Karhi-Chandi Limestone Mines
unstarredLOK SABHA · 18th Lok Sabha · Session 8 · Question no. 3522 · Asked on 2026-08-10
Ministry: ENVIRONMENT, FOREST AND CLIMATE CHANGE
Member asked
(a) whether it is a fact that complaints regarding environmental irregularities, the Karhi reservoir and tribal land pertaining to the Karhi-Chandi Limestone Mines (Shree Cement), District Balodabazar, have been received by the Government during the last five years; (b) if so, the details thereof and the response of the Government thereto; (c) whether the Government had issued directions on 12.09.2025 to the Mineral Resources Department, State Government of Chhattisgarh, and the Chhattisgarh Environment Conservation Board to investigate the said complaints, take necessary action and provide a report thereof to the Government and the complainant; (d) if so, the details of action taken reports received from the State Government so far in compliance with the said directions; (e) whether the final investigation or action has not been completed, if so, the reasons therefor; and (f) whether the Union Government is likely to fix a time limit for the time-bound resolution of this matter or ensure early action by the State Government and if so, the details thereof?
We have not ingested a reply for this question yet. This does not mean the government gave no reply.
Original question sourceIntegrated Claim Settlement System under IEPFA
unstarredLOK SABHA · 18th Lok Sabha · Session 8 · Question no. 3523 · Asked on 2026-08-10
Ministry: CORPORATE AFFAIRS
Member asked
Praveen Patel, Anurag Sharma, Radheshyam Rathiya, Manna Lal Rawat, Mahima Kumari Mewar, Sanjay Jaiswal
(a) whether the Government has undertaken measures to strengthen the claim settlement mechanism under the Investor Education and Protection Fund Authority (IEPFA); (b) if so, the details thereof; (c) the number of claims received, approved and disposed of through the Integrated IEPFA Portal since its operationalisation; (d) whether any assessment has been made regarding the reduction in claim processing and settlement timelines following the integration of MCA-21, National Securities Depository Limited/Central Depository Services (India) Limited (NSDL/CDSL) and Public Financial Management System (PFMS), if so, the details thereof; (e) the number of grievances received and resolved through the dedicated IEPFA Call Centre since its operationalisation, including the average grievance resolution time; and (f) whether the Government proposes further reforms, including automation, digital verification, simplified documentation, enhanced investor awareness and technology-enabled monitoring, to improve transparency, efficiency, accessibility and timely settlement of claims under the IEPFA framework and if so, the details thereof?
We have not ingested a reply for this question yet. This does not mean the government gave no reply.
Original question sourceRural Skill Development in Tamil Nadu
unstarredLOK SABHA · 18th Lok Sabha · Session 8 · Question no. 3524 · Asked on 2026-08-10
Ministry: SKILL DEVELOPMENT AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP
Member asked
(a) the major initiatives undertaken by the Government to expand the reach of skill development programmes in rural and aspirational areas of Tamil Nadu during the last three years and the current year; (b) the details of training centres established, candidates enrolled, trained, certified and placed under various said programmes in the said districts of Tamil Nadu during the said period, district-wise; (c) the measures taken/being taken by the Government to strengthen skill development infrastructure, digital training facilities and industry partnerships in the said areas to improve employment opportunities for youth; (d) whether any special initiatives have been launched to promote skill development among women, Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and other disadvantaged groups in the said areas; and (e) the further steps proposed to be taken by the Government to enhance placement support, entrepreneurship and apprenticeship opportunities for youth in the said areas of Tamil Nadu?
We have not ingested a reply for this question yet. This does not mean the government gave no reply.
Original question sourcePromotion of Punjabi Language in Higher Education
unstarredLOK SABHA · 18th Lok Sabha · Session 8 · Question no. 3525 · Asked on 2026-08-10
Ministry: EDUCATION
Member asked
We have not ingested the asking members for this question.
(a) the measures taken by the Government to encourage higher education, management education and social science research in Punjabi language; (b) whether any textbooks, digital learning material and research publications have been prepared in Punjabi under the National Education Policy, 2020, if so, the details thereof; (c) the details of funds allocated for this purpose during the last five years; and (d) the future roadmap for strengthening Punjabi as a medium of higher education in Central educational institutions?
We have not ingested a reply for this question yet. This does not mean the government gave no reply.
Original question sourcePolitically Exposed Persons in the Banking Sector
unstarredLOK SABHA · 18th Lok Sabha · Session 8 · Question no. 3526 · Asked on 2026-08-10
Ministry: FINANCE
Member asked
(a) whether the term “Politically Exposed Persons” (PEPs) is used in the banking and financial sector, if so, the definition and categories of persons, including family members and close associates, covered thereunder; (b) the details of public positions, professions/occupations or categories of persons classified or treated as PEPs under the extant rules/guidelines; (c) whether the Government is aware of concerns that such classification may result in enhanced scrutiny, restrictions or hardship in availing banking and financial services for elected representatives, other persons holding public positions, their family members and close associates, if so, the details thereof; and (d) whether the Government proposes to review the existing PEP guidelines to ensure that such classification does not result in unwarranted discrimination or hardship to persons covered thereunder and if so, the details thereof?
We have not ingested a reply for this question yet. This does not mean the government gave no reply.
Original question sourceSupport for Artists
unstarredLOK SABHA · 18th Lok Sabha · Session 8 · Question no. 3527 · Asked on 2026-08-10
Ministry: CULTURE
Member asked
(a) the details of total number of artists supported by the Zonal Cultural Centres (ZCCs) during the last five years, State/UT-wise and category-wise, including folk, tribal, classical and contemporary artists; (b) the details of the financial support, including honorarium, scholarships, grants and other assistance provided to tribal artists, other artists, cultural institutions and art organizations during the last five years, along with the number of beneficiaries benefited under each scheme, year, scheme and State-wise; (c) whether the Government maintains separate data on beneficiaries belonging to the Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs) under its various schemes for artists and, if so, the details thereof, including the number of SC and ST beneficiaries, scheme and State/UT-wise; and (d) the details of steps taken by the Government to strengthen further financial support for tribal artists, enhance their livelihood opportunities, and preserve, promote and revive endangered folk, tribal and traditional art forms across the country?
We have not ingested a reply for this question yet. This does not mean the government gave no reply.
Original question sourceInitiative for Promotion of Emerging Technologies in Schools
unstarredLOK SABHA · 18th Lok Sabha · Session 8 · Question no. 3528 · Asked on 2026-08-10
Ministry: EDUCATION
Member asked
(a) the details of the initiatives undertaken by the Government across the States to promote digital transformation, Artificial Intelligence (AI), coding and other emerging technologies in school education along with the status of their implementation, State and district-wise; (b) the number of schools equipped with digital infrastructure including smart classrooms, computer laboratories and internet connectivity, State and district-wise; (c) the number of students and teachers who have been provided training in AI, coding and digital skills under various Government programmes, State and district-wise; (d) the details of the financial allocation and expenditure incurred for promoting digital and technology-enabled learning in schools during the last three years, State-wise; and (e) the details of the progress made in Madhya Pradesh, particularly in Satna Lok Sabha Constituency in regard to the above initiative and the measures being taken by the Government to bridge the digital divide and ensure equitable access to future-ready education across rural and urban areas?
We have not ingested a reply for this question yet. This does not mean the government gave no reply.
Original question sourceConservation of Protected Monuments in Tiruchirappalli and Pudukkottai
unstarredLOK SABHA · 18th Lok Sabha · Session 8 · Question no. 3529 · Asked on 2026-08-10
Ministry: CULTURE
Member asked
We have not ingested the asking members for this question.
(a) whether the Government has undertaken any assessment of the condition of Archaeological Survey of India (ASI)-protected monuments in Tiruchirappalli and Pudukkottai districts, Tamil Nadu; (b) the details of conservation, restoration, maintenance and infrastructure development works undertaken by the ASI in the said districts during the last three years, along with the funds allocated and utilised; (c) whether any proposals for conservation, structural restoration, visitor amenities, interpretation centres or heritage tourism development in the said districts are pending with the Ministry or the ASI; (d) if so, the details alongwith present status thereof; and (e) the details of steps taken/being taken by the Government to strengthen the preservation, promotion and sustainable tourism potential of ASI-protected monuments in the said districts?
We have not ingested a reply for this question yet. This does not mean the government gave no reply.
Original question sourceProtection of Cultural Heritage and Traditional Artists under KSVY
unstarredLOK SABHA · 18th Lok Sabha · Session 8 · Question no. 3530 · Asked on 2026-08-10
Ministry: CULTURE
Member asked
Bharat Singh Kushwah, Darshan Singh Choudhary
(a) whether the Government has conducted any evaluation of the impact and progress of Kala Sanskriti Vikas Yojana (KSVY) in promoting traditional art forms, folk culture, performing arts and cultural activities across the country during the last five years, if so, the details thereof, State/UT-wise, particularly in Arani Lok Sabha Constituency of Tamil Nadu; (b) whether the Government has received requests from cultural organisations and artists regarding delays in approval, release of grants or procedural difficulties under the said scheme, if so, the details thereof; (c) the details of steps taken/being taken by the Government to ensure wider outreach, transparency, timely financial assistance, greater participation of artists and cultural institutions, development of cultural infrastructure and linkages with cultural tourism for young and emerging artists particularly from rural, tribal and economically weaker sections; (d) the details of targets set for 2026–27 and upcoming years, proposed new initiatives and financial and technical support to be provided to the States; (e) whether the Government is considering implementing any special plan/scheme to preserve and promote the rich cultural and music traditions, connect local artists and cultural institutions with the said scheme and expand cultural activities in Madhya Pradesh, especially the Gwalior Lok Sabha constituency; and (f) if so, the details thereof?
We have not ingested a reply for this question yet. This does not mean the government gave no reply.
Original question source
These records are read from the Parliament of India record at sansad.in.