Questions and answers
What members asked in the House, and how the government replied. Each record links to the page we read it from, so you can check it yourself.
What we hold
25,473Questions we have ingested: 25,473 · of those, with a reply on file: 3,495
This counts what we have read from the record, not everything Parliament did. A question with no reply here is one whose reply we have not read yet.
Showing 526–550 / 25,473
Rural Households with FHTCs in Kerala
unstarredLOK SABHA · 18th Lok Sabha · Session 8 · Question no. 2996 · Asked on 2026-08-06
Ministry: JAL SHAKTI
Member asked
(a) the total number of rural households provided with Functional Household Tap Connections (FHTCs) in Kerala under the Centrally sponsored schemes implemented by the Department of Drinking Water and Sanitation in partnership with the State Governments through local self-governments; (b) the measures taken to approve special fiscal relaxations for local bodies facing difficulties in clearing pending contractor bills amounting to Rs. 3,461 crore as on June 2024; (c) whether the Government has conducted any independent audit on the quality and continuity of safe drinking water supply across rural Gram Panchayats and if so, the details thereof; (d) the total amount of funds remaining unutilised by the States from the Basic Grants allocated under the Fifteenth Finance Commission for sanitation and water services, State-wise; and (e) the timeline by which the Government expects to provide safe drinking water to the remaining rural households facing severe drinking water scarcity?
We have not ingested a reply for this question yet. This does not mean the government gave no reply.
Original question sourceUn-electrified Households under Saubhagya
unstarredLOK SABHA · 18th Lok Sabha · Session 8 · Question no. 2997 · Asked on 2026-08-06
Ministry: POWER
Member asked
We have not ingested the asking members for this question.
(a) the details of rural households having electricity connections but receiving less than twelve hours, eight hours and four hours of daily power supply respectively, State/UT-wise; (b) whether the Government reduced the estimated number of unelectrified households under the Pradhan Mantri Sahaj Bijli Har Ghar Yojana (SAUBHAGYA) from 300 lakh households, as approved in the scheme guidelines to 248 lakh households on the dashboard before declaring hundred percent electrification, if so, the details thereof, State/UT-wise; (c) the details of households excluded from the original target of 300 lakh households under SAUBHAGYA, State/UT-wise along with the reasons for such exclusion; (d) whether seven States had reported 19.10 lakh unelectrified households as on 31 March, 2019 and sought extension of timelines, if so, the details thereof; and (e) the manner in which the Government justify by declaring near-universal electrification before completion of the remaining works?
We have not ingested a reply for this question yet. This does not mean the government gave no reply.
Original question sourceAssessment on Post-Harvest Losses
unstarredLOK SABHA · 18th Lok Sabha · Session 8 · Question no. 2998 · Asked on 2026-08-06
Ministry: FOOD PROCESSING INDUSTRIES
Member asked
(a) whether the Government has conducted any assessment regarding post-harvest losses of cereals, pulses, fruits and vegetables across different agro-climatic regions and if so, the details thereof; (b) the estimates of such losses and their economic impact on farmers' incomes, commodity-wise and State-wise; and (c) the steps taken to strengthen scientific storage, cold-chain infrastructure, grading, packaging and value-addition facilities through convergence of Central and State schemes?
We have not ingested a reply for this question yet. This does not mean the government gave no reply.
Original question sourceDamage to Irrigation Infrastructure due to Floods
unstarredLOK SABHA · 18th Lok Sabha · Session 8 · Question no. 2999 · Asked on 2026-08-06
Ministry: JAL SHAKTI
Member asked
(a) whether repeated floods due to Brahmaputra and its tributaries have damaged irrigation infrastructure in Dhubri district and if so, the details thereof; (b) the number of such damaged irrigation structures reported during the last five years; (c) the funds allocated for their repair and restoration; and (d) the steps taken to make such infrastructure flood-resilient?
We have not ingested a reply for this question yet. This does not mean the government gave no reply.
Original question sourceNamo Bharat Regional Rapid Transit System
unstarredLOK SABHA · 18th Lok Sabha · Session 8 · Question no. 3000 · Asked on 2026-08-06
Ministry: HOUSING AND URBAN AFFAIRS
Member asked
Hemang Joshi, Pradeep Kumar Singh, Arun Govil, Janardan Mishra, Manish Jaiswal
(a) the details of the milestones achieved under the Namo Bharat Regional Rapid Transit System (RRTS), particularly following the full operationalisation of the 82-kilometre Delhi–Ghaziabad–Meerut corridor in February, 2026; (b) the details of the current ridership metrics and punctuality standards including the framework for multimodal convergence with existing metro networks and bus terminals to facilitate seamless commuter mobility; (c) the details of the current status and projected roadmap for the subsequent Phase-I corridors and the proposed linkage to Jewar Airport to ensure interoperable regional connectivity; and (d) the details of the specific interventions implemented by the National Capital Region Transport Corporation (NCRTC) to foster transit-oriented development, integrate renewable energy solutions and provide inclusive fare structures for marginalised categories?
We have not ingested a reply for this question yet. This does not mean the government gave no reply.
Original question sourceWidening of Aroor to Edappally Stretch on NH-66
unstarredLOK SABHA · 18th Lok Sabha · Session 8 · Question no. 3001 · Asked on 2026-08-06
Ministry: ROAD TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAYS
Member asked
(a) whether the Government proposes an eight-lane elevated highway on the Aroor to Edappally stretch of National Highway (NH)-66; (b) if so, the details and the present status thereof and if not, the reasons therefor; (c) whether the Aroor to Edappally stretch of NH-66 is among the most congested National Highway stretches in Kerala and if so, the comparative traffic data thereof; (d) whether there are any alternative arrangements proposed to address the severe traffic congestion on the Aroor to Edappally stretch of NH-66, which has multiple major junctions and crossings of the Kochi Metro corridor, if so, the details thereof and if not, the reasons therefor; and (e) whether the Aroor to Edappally stretch of NH-66 in Kerala is the only National Highway stretch without a clear decision or timeline from the Government, if so, the details thereof?
We have not ingested a reply for this question yet. This does not mean the government gave no reply.
Original question sourceExpansion of National Gas Grid and CGD Infrastructure
unstarredLOK SABHA · 18th Lok Sabha · Session 8 · Question no. 3002 · Asked on 2026-08-06
Ministry: PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS
Member asked
Bhartruhari Mahtab, Jashubhai Rathva, Sanjay Jaiswal, Manish Jaiswal, Vijay Baghel, Krishna Prasad Tenneti, Mahima Kumari Mewar, Dilip Saikia, P. P. Chaudhary, Rajkumar Chahar, Manna Lal Rawat, Janardan Mishra, Rahul Lodhi, Chandra Prakash Choudhary, Kamaljeet Sehrawat, Manoj Tiwari
(a) whether the Government has reviewed the progress of the National Gas Grid and associated natural gas pipeline network across the country, if so, the details thereof including its present length, State-wise and in Dewas-Shajapur Parliamentary Constituency; (b) the details of natural gas pipeline projects sanctioned/under implementation/operational under the National Gas Grid and the progress made in expanding pipeline connectivity in the country and to previously unconnected regions, districts and industrial clusters, particularly in Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, Jharkhand and the Pali Parliamentary Constituency; (c) whether the Government has taken/proposes to take measures to expedite ongoing pipeline projects, strengthen inter-State connectivity, expand City Gas Distribution (CGD) infrastructure including Piped Natural Gas (PNG) and Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) facilities particularly in above States and in Delhi especially in North-East Delhi, the Ratlam–Jhabua–Alirajpur and Dewas–Shajapur Parliamentary Constituencies in view of its importance for Tribal/Industrial development in Madhya Pradesh along with the timeline, funds allocated and any special plan therein, if so, the details thereof; and (d) the expected impact of the expansion of the National Gas Grid and CGD network on industrial growth, clean energy adoption, employment generation, natural gas accessibility and the development of a gas-based economy in the country?
We have not ingested a reply for this question yet. This does not mean the government gave no reply.
Original question sourcePromotion of Sustainable Aviation Fuel
unstarredLOK SABHA · 18th Lok Sabha · Session 8 · Question no. 3003 · Asked on 2026-08-06
Ministry: PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS
Member asked
(a) whether the Government has implemented any special policy, incentive scheme or action plan during the year 2026 to promote the production, use and supply of Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF), if so, the details thereof; (b) whether the Government is taking any special initiative in collaboration with Oil Marketing Companies, aviation companies, research institutions and the private sector to enhance the production capacity, blending, quality standards and supply chain of SAF for increasing its use in the aviation sector, if so, the details thereof; (c) the details of the pilot projects approved, research and development activities, investments, production capacity and financial assistance relating to SAF during the year 2026; and (d) whether the Government is implementing any time-bound action plan to promote the indigenous production of SAF from agricultural residues, used cooking oil, bio-waste and other bio-based feedstocks with a view to reduce dependence on imported aviation fuel and lowering carbon emissions, if so, the details thereof?
We have not ingested a reply for this question yet. This does not mean the government gave no reply.
Original question sourceDevelopment of Aviation Sector under UDAN Scheme
unstarredLOK SABHA · 18th Lok Sabha · Session 8 · Question no. 3004 · Asked on 2026-08-06
Ministry: CIVIL AVIATION
Member asked
(a) the details and the current status of implementation of the Ude Desh ka Aam Nagrik (UDAN) scheme including the number of routes operationalised, airports/heliports/water aerodromes made functional, State/UT-wise, particularly in Kallakurichi Lok Sabha Constituency of Tamil Nadu; (b) the total funds allocated, released and utilised under the said scheme since its inception till date, year-wise; (c) whether several regional routes have been discontinued or suspended due to low passenger traffic or financial viability issues and if so, the details thereof; (d) the steps taken to improve last-mile air connectivity in remote, hilly and coastal regions and to ensure long-term sustainability of subsidised routes; and (e) whether the Government proposes any modification or extension of the UDAN Scheme beyond its current phase and if so, the details thereof?
We have not ingested a reply for this question yet. This does not mean the government gave no reply.
Original question sourceMultimodal Logistics Parks under Bharatmala Pariyojana
unstarredLOK SABHA · 18th Lok Sabha · Session 8 · Question no. 3005 · Asked on 2026-08-06
Ministry: ROAD TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAYS
Member asked
Chandra Prakash Choudhary, Balabhadra Majhi, Manoj Tiwari, K. Sudhakar, Hemant Savara, Naba Charan Majhi, Lavu Sri Krishna Devarayalu, Manish Jaiswal, Avimanyu Sethi, Jugal Kishore, Vishweshwar Hegde Kageri, Mahima Kumari Mewar, Ravi Kishan, Haribhai Patel
(a) whether the Government has undertaken any review of the development of Multimodal Logistics Parks under Bharatmala Pariyojana and if so, the details thereof, State/UT-wise; (b) the progress achieved in development and operationalisation of Multimodal Logistics Parks across the country, States/UTs-wise; (c) the details of States where agreements have been signed with private companies for the develoment of such parks, State/UT-wise; (d) the measures undertaken to strengthen multimodal connectivity by integrating road infrastructure with railways, ports, inland waterways and other freight transport networks to support industrial clusters, agricultural produce and MSMEs in the country, State/UT-wise; (e) the expected impact of these Logistics Parks on reducing logistics costs, improving freight efficiency, attracting investments, generating employment, promoting economic and industrial growth in the country, State/UT-wise; and (f) whether any additional Multimodal Logistics Parks have been proposed or are under consideration in the country and if so, the details and the current status thereof along with the expected timelines for their completion, State/UT-wise;
We have not ingested a reply for this question yet. This does not mean the government gave no reply.
Original question sourceBhoomi Rashi Portal for Land Acquisition
unstarredLOK SABHA · 18th Lok Sabha · Session 8 · Question no. 3006 · Asked on 2026-08-06
Ministry: ROAD TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAYS
Member asked
Dulu Mahato, Ashish Dubey, Ramesh Awasthi, Shobhanaben Baraiya, Himadri Singh, Praveen Patel, Vijay Baghel, Jugal Kishore, P. P. Chaudhary, Janardan Mishra, Sukhjinder Singh Randhawa, Arun Govil, Kamaljeet Sehrawat, Sanjay Jadhav
(a) whether the Government has reviewed the implementation of the Bhoomi Rashi Portal for land acquisition under National Highway (NH) projects, if so, the details thereof, State/UT-wise; (b) the details of land acquired, affected farmers/landowners and compensation paid to them through the said portal, State-wise and district-wise; (c) the details of the progress made in digitisation of the land acquisition process and direct disbursement of compensation through the portal and the present status thereof, State/UT-wise particularly in Punjab; (d) whether any special measures and the steps have been taken to improve transparency, reduce delays in land acquisition, resolve pending cases and address grievances of farmers under National Highway projects, if so, the details thereof, State/UT-wise; (e) the impact of the said portal on expediting project implementation, ensuring transparency and improving timely disbursement of compensation to affected landowners, State/UT-wise; and (f) the details of ongoing and upcoming NH infrastructure project, State/UT-wise?
We have not ingested a reply for this question yet. This does not mean the government gave no reply.
Original question sourceFunding for Polavaram Phase-I
unstarredLOK SABHA · 18th Lok Sabha · Session 8 · Question no. 3007 · Asked on 2026-08-06
Ministry: JAL SHAKTI
Member asked
(a) whether the Government has approved funding for Polavaram Phase-I (storage up to 41.15 metres) and the subsequent sanction of the recent multi-tranche grants for completion of the project and if so, the details thereof; (b) whether the project is on track to achieve the 41.15 metre storage milestone by the 2027 timeline and the critical construction milestones that remain to be completed and if so, the details thereof; (c) whether the sanctioned grant is exclusively for Phase-I works or also includes canal networks, the powerhouse and outstanding rehabilitation and resettlement liabilities and if so, the details thereof; and (d) the status of compliance by the State Government of Andhra Pradesh with technical and financial preconditions, including submission of updated project reports and utilisation certificates, required for release of the remaining grant tranches as of June, 2026?
We have not ingested a reply for this question yet. This does not mean the government gave no reply.
Original question sourceNational Aquifer Mapping and Management Programme
unstarredLOK SABHA · 18th Lok Sabha · Session 8 · Question no. 3008 · Asked on 2026-08-06
Ministry: JAL SHAKTI
Member asked
Anup Dhotre, Smita Wagh, Vishnu Dayal Ram, Balabhadra Majhi, Kamaljeet Sehrawat, Tejasvi Surya, Godam Nagesh, Mala Rajya Laxmi Shah, Bibhu Prasad Tarai, Avimanyu Sethi, Sukanta Kumar Panigrahi, Yaduveer Wadiyar, Mahima Kumari Mewar, Trivendra Singh Rawat, Khagen Murmu
(a) whether the Government has undertaken any review of the implementation of the National Aquifer Mapping and Management Programme (NAQUIM 2.0) in the country and if so, the details and the major outcomes thereof, State-wise, particularly in Maharashtra, Andhra Pradesh, Uttarakhand, Madhya Pradesh including Dewas-Shajapur Lok Sabha Constituency and Odisha including Kandhamal Lok Sabha Constituency; (b) the progress achieved in high-resolution aquifer mapping and preparation of area-specific groundwater management plans under the programme in the country, State-wise, particularly in Maharashtra including Jalgaon Lok Sabha Constituency, district-wise in Andhra Pradesh including Konaseema district and district-wise in Madhya Pradesh including Dewas and Shajapur districts; (c) the details of the mechanism established to facilitate utilisation of scientific inputs generated under NAQUIM 2.0 by various State Governments including the State Government of Andhra Pradesh, Panchayati Raj Institutions and local bodies for groundwater planning and management; (d) the manner in which the said programme is expected to strengthen evidence-based groundwater management and the steps taken to promote evidence-based sustainable groundwater management, climate-resilient water management in the country, particularly in Rajasthan, Andhra Pradesh including Konaseema district and Madhya Pradesh including Dewas-Shajapur Lok Sabha Constituency; (e) whether the Government proposes to extend NAQUIM 2.0 interventions to groundwater-stressed areas in Jalgaon Lok Sabha Constituency and if so, the details thereof; and (f) the funds allocated, released and utilised for implementation of NAQUIM 2.0 in Andhra Pradesh during the last three years?
We have not ingested a reply for this question yet. This does not mean the government gave no reply.
Original question sourceImplementation of PMEGP in Perambalur
unstarredLOK SABHA · 18th Lok Sabha · Session 8 · Question no. 3009 · Asked on 2026-08-06
Ministry: MICRO, SMALL AND MEDIUM ENTERPRISES
Member asked
(a) the total financial subsidies and margin money disbursed under the Prime Minister's Employment Generation Programme (PMEGP) within the Perambalur Lok Sabha constituency of Tamil Nadu over the last three years; (b) the specific number of new agro-based and textile manufacturing micro-units successfully established by the local youth and women entrepreneurs in the Perambalur district during the said period; (c) whether the Ministry has noted a high rate of rejection of the applications or excessive demands for collateral by the regional rural banks, contrary to the central scheme guidelines and if so, the details thereof; (d) the total formal employment directly generated by these PMEGP-funded enterprises within the said constituency during the last three years; and (e) the administrative steps being taken by the Government to simplify the online application process and conduct targeted entrepreneurship awareness camps in the rural blocks of Perambalur?
We have not ingested a reply for this question yet. This does not mean the government gave no reply.
Original question sourceCentral Excise Duty on Petrol and Diesel
unstarredLOK SABHA · 18th Lok Sabha · Session 8 · Question no. 3010 · Asked on 2026-08-06
Ministry: PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS
Member asked
(a) the total Central Excise Duty collected on petrol and diesel for domestic consumption during the last three financial years from 2023-24 to 2025-26 and the current financial year up to date; (b) the total revenue earned by the Union Government from Central Excise Duty and other Central levies on petrol and diesel during each of the last twelve years along with the breakup thereof, year-wise; and (c) the proportion of the retail selling price of petrol and diesel constituted by taxes, dealer commission and refinery price?
We have not ingested a reply for this question yet. This does not mean the government gave no reply.
Original question sourceScheme for Sub-stations and Transmission Network in Etawah
unstarredLOK SABHA · 18th Lok Sabha · Session 8 · Question no. 3011 · Asked on 2026-08-06
Ministry: POWER
Member asked
(a) whether the Government proposes to implement any special scheme for the modernisation of sub-stations and transmission network to address the issues of frequent power tripping and low voltage in Etawah Lok Sabha Constituency; and (b) if so, the details thereof?
We have not ingested a reply for this question yet. This does not mean the government gave no reply.
Original question sourceSeasonal Migration of Van Gujjar Tribal Community
unstarredLOK SABHA · 18th Lok Sabha · Session 8 · Question no. 3012 · Asked on 2026-08-06
Ministry: TRIBAL AFFAIRS
Member asked
(a) whether the Government had issued a letter on 5 June 2025 directing the State Government of Uttarakhand and the district administrations to expedite the recognition of the rights of Van Gujjars over seasonal grazing areas in response to the harassment faced by them during their seasonal migration, if so, the details thereof; (b) the action taken by the Tribal Department of the State Government of Uttarakhand in response to the issues raised in the said letter; and (c) whether the Government has formulated any future plan to safeguard forest-dependent pastoral communities undertaking their annual seasonal migration, if so, the details thereof?
We have not ingested a reply for this question yet. This does not mean the government gave no reply.
Original question sourceSlum Rehabilitation Scheme
unstarredLOK SABHA · 18th Lok Sabha · Session 8 · Question no. 3013 · Asked on 2026-08-06
Ministry: HOUSING AND URBAN AFFAIRS
Member asked
(a) the present status of slum rehabilitation schemes in the country; (b) the steps taken by the Government to provide affordable housing in urban areas; (c) the progress made under housing schemes for the urban poor; (d) the present status of the land allocation policy for housing projects; and (e) the manner in which housing development is being undertaken under the Smart Cities Mission?
We have not ingested a reply for this question yet. This does not mean the government gave no reply.
Original question sourceSchemes for Road Accident Victims
unstarredLOK SABHA · 18th Lok Sabha · Session 8 · Question no. 3014 · Asked on 2026-08-06
Ministry: ROAD TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAYS
Member asked
(a) the details of the Central schemes for road accident victims in the country; (b) the details of the compensation and medical assistance provided under these schemes; (c) the number of road accident victims benefited under these schemes in the Shahjahanpur Parliamentary Constituency; (d) the details of the issues being faced in the disbursement of compensation to such victims in the country; and (e) the impact of these schemes on providing assistance to road accident victims?
We have not ingested a reply for this question yet. This does not mean the government gave no reply.
Original question sourceExpression of Interest for APC Scheme
unstarredLOK SABHA · 18th Lok Sabha · Session 8 · Question no. 3015 · Asked on 2026-08-06
Ministry: FOOD PROCESSING INDUSTRIES
Member asked
(a) the number of Expression of Interest (EoIs) received for Agro Processing Clusters (APC) Scheme in Maharashtra post-2020 and projects approved thereof, district-wise; (b) the status of the twelve Maharashtra APC projects including original timelines, current physical progress, revised completion timelines with penalties, if any, imposed on execution agencies; (c) the grant utilisation percentage and specific reasons for prolonged "Under Implementation" status for the same; and (d) the concrete steps taken to provide market access and reduce post-harvest losses via Pradhan Mantri Kisan SAMPADA Yojana (PMKSY) and Production Linked Incentive Scheme for Food Processing Industry (PLISFPI), including the number of beneficiaries and value addition units established thereof?
We have not ingested a reply for this question yet. This does not mean the government gave no reply.
Original question sourceIrrigation Projects under PMKSY-AIBP
unstarredLOK SABHA · 18th Lok Sabha · Session 8 · Question no. 3016 · Asked on 2026-08-06
Ministry: JAL SHAKTI
Member asked
Rajeev Kumar Rai, Pushpendra Saroj, Priya Saroj
(a) the number of major and medium irrigation projects under the Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchayee Yojana–Accelerated Irrigation Benefits Programme (PMKSY-AIBP) that remain delayed beyond their approved completion schedule, State and district-wise, particularly in Uttar Pradesh; (b) the current status of the Saryu Nahar National Project and other PMKSY-AIBP projects in Uttar Pradesh including the cost revisions, additional Central assistance released and the revised completion timelines; (c) the details of the gap between Irrigation Potential Created and Irrigation Potential Utilised under Central irrigation projects in Uttar Pradesh, along with the reasons identified for such gap; (d) the assistance released under the Micro Irrigation Fund for Uttar Pradesh and the area brought under micro-irrigation therefrom; and (e) the measures taken to improve utilisation of irrigation infrastructure and address waterlogging and canal seepage in command areas supported under Central schemes?
We have not ingested a reply for this question yet. This does not mean the government gave no reply.
Original question sourceLPG Distribution in Tamil Nadu
unstarredLOK SABHA · 18th Lok Sabha · Session 8 · Question no. 3017 · Asked on 2026-08-06
Ministry: PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS
Member asked
We have not ingested the asking members for this question.
(a) whether the Government has undertaken measures to strengthen the Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) distribution network in Tamil Nadu, particularly in Dharmapuri Parliamentary Constituency, to ensure timely and convenient access to domestic LPG for all households, if so, the details thereof; (b) the number of LPG distributors, delivery points and LPG consumers in Dharmapuri Parliamentary Constituency and the steps taken to expand the distribution infrastructure during the last three years; (c) whether the Government proposes to establish additional LPG distributorships or strengthen delivery logistics in rural and remote areas of Dharmapuri to improve last-mile service delivery, if so, the details thereof; and (d) the measures taken to promote consumer safety, digital booking, doorstep delivery and timely refill supply and to further enhance LPG accessibility and service quality across Tamil Nadu including Dharmapuri Parliamentary Constituency?
We have not ingested a reply for this question yet. This does not mean the government gave no reply.
Original question sourceExtension of Jal Jeevan Mission
unstarredLOK SABHA · 18th Lok Sabha · Session 8 · Question no. 3018 · Asked on 2026-08-06
Ministry: JAL SHAKTI
Member asked
Naresh Mhaske, Bharti Pardhi, Shrikant Shinde, Raj Kumar Chabbewal, Shrirang Barne, Ravindra Waikar
(a) whether the Government proposes to extend the Jal Jeevan Mission (JJM) up to December 2028 with the objective of achieving universal coverage of Functional Household Tap Connections (FHTCs) across the country and if so, the details thereof; (b) the extent of progress achieved under the said Mission so far including the coverage of rural households and improvements made in drinking water infrastructure; (c) the reasons and policy considerations that necessitated the proposed extension of the said Mission beyond its earlier timeline; (d) the strategies being adopted during the extended period to address regional disparities, water quality challenges and sustainability of drinking water sources; and (e) whether the proposed extension is aligned with the long-term objectives of water security and improved public health outcomes and if so, the details thereof?
We have not ingested a reply for this question yet. This does not mean the government gave no reply.
Original question sourceReplacement of Faulty Distribution Transformers
unstarredLOK SABHA · 18th Lok Sabha · Session 8 · Question no. 3019 · Asked on 2026-08-06
Ministry: POWER
Member asked
(a) whether inordinate delays in the replacement of faulty Distribution Transformers in rural and semi-urban areas are resulting in prolonged disruption of electricity supply and if so, the details thereof; (b) whether overloading of Distribution Transformers, pending pole shifting at various locations and dilapidated electricity poles situated in densely populated areas are increasing the risk of accidents and if so, the details thereof; (c) whether the Government is preparing any time-bound national action plan to ensure decentralisation of Distribution Transformers, expeditious shifting of dilapidated electricity poles and poles located in densely populated areas, installation of underground/cable-based electricity lines and early electrification of long-inhabited majras, tolas, new colonies and settlements in coordination with the States; and (d) if so, the details thereof?
We have not ingested a reply for this question yet. This does not mean the government gave no reply.
Original question sourceProjects and Schemes Financed by HUDCO
unstarredLOK SABHA · 18th Lok Sabha · Session 8 · Question no. 3020 · Asked on 2026-08-06
Ministry: HOUSING AND URBAN AFFAIRS
Member asked
Appalanaidu Kalisetti, Byreddy Shabari
(a) the details of urban infrastructure projects financed by the Housing and Urban Development Corporation (HUDCO) during the last five years, year and State-wise; (b) the funds sanctioned and disbursed by HUDCO for such projects during the said period, year and State-wise; (c) the physical progress and completion status of HUDCO approved projects along with the reasons for delays, if any; (d) whether HUDCO has conducted any capacity-building or training programmes for State Government officials, particularly in Andhra Pradesh and if so, the details thereof along with the number of programmes conducted, participants trained and themes covered, year-wise; and (e) the details of the housing schemes funded by HUDCO including the names of schemes, States covered, the number of beneficiaries and the financial assistance provided?
We have not ingested a reply for this question yet. This does not mean the government gave no reply.
Original question source
These records are read from the Parliament of India record at sansad.in.